Tennis is a very physically and emotionally demanding sport, partly because of its indefinite match duration and partly because of the intense competition. Playing singles matches on the tour while maintaining relationships with your coaching staff is hard enough.
But teaming up and cooperating with another player as part of a doubles team is an easier-said-than-done task. And when the partnership reaches the breaking point, the decisions made leaves fans and players alike distraught.
What’s behind these splits is always a mystery – even to the participants themselves.
Here are four of the most shocking doubles splits in tennis history.
#1 – Martina Hingis & Sania Mirza:
Fondly called “Santina” by fans and pundits as an amalgamation of their names (Sania+marTina), the Indo-Swiss women’s doubles team was a force to be reckoned with.
And they seemed to be extremely fond of each other aside from their on court achievements and success.
In all they won 14 titles, including three Majors, together in a 16-month long partnership, which is remarkable consistency for any team at any level of any sport.
At the time of their split, Hingis and Mirza were ranked number one in the world of women’s doubles. A strange time to announce a split indeed.
After three Grand Slam victories and eleven WTA doubles titles together, we have mutually agreed that we would each be open to playing with other players for the remainder of the season. Perhaps, because of our great past results, we have had very high expectations from our partnership and unfortunately did not get the results we desired recently. We would like to clarify that it was a totally professional decision based purely on our recent results. The professional decision has not and will not in any way affect the wonderful personal relationship that we continue to share. We also look forward to defending our title in the year-end WTA Finals in Singapore in October for which Santina has already qualified.We hope that this puts to rest some of the fabricated stories that have been doing the rounds in some sections of the media. Best Sania and Martina
But it is far from clear what may have led to the sudden and unexpected end of the partnership. Pairs as successful and friendly as Mirza and Hingis can hardly be expected to split over things such as short-term results.
#2 – Leander Paes & Mahesh Bhupathi:
The tennis partnership of Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi was nicknamed the ″Indian Express″. The Indian duo has a 303–103 career record together. They have a higher success rate against various top teams. They have a Davis Cup record of the longest winning streak in doubles, with 23 straight wins.
In the 2006 Asian Games, they lost a match against Chinese Team because of which Leander questioned Bhupathi’s commitment towards Indian tennis. Leander had also said in an interview that although he and Bhupathi are friends, he did not consider pairing with his former teammate.
But still, for the 2008 Beijing Olympics, they decided to play tennis together for India, and lost in the quarterfinals to the eventual champions Roger Federer and Stanislas Wawrinka.
In 2011, the pair won the doubles title at Chennai Open. They reunited to play tennis in a Grand Slam Tournament and claimed runners-up in the 2011 Australian Open and reached the semifinals in the year-end championships.
But Paes was dissatisfied where they were headed and decided to partner with Radek Stepanek in 2012, a decision that irked Bhupathi.
Amidst the latest furore over the Olympics doubles team Bhupati even went on to call Paes a ‘backstabber’ a term used in many sports headlines. Clearly, their relationship has deteriorated to the point of no return.
Paes was at ease with the attention, was debonair and outgoing and had a penchant for the histrionics too. Bhupathi, in stark contrast, has always been a man of few words and inward drawn.
The first sign of discord surfaced when they had differences over Enrico Piperno, Paes’s trainer during his initial days. Piperno, who had a huge influence on Paes, “did not fancy Bhupathi”. However, Paes believed Piperno would be more useful in a managerial capacity
Also, Bhupati had lived in Paes’s shadow long enough and wanted to make his own decisions. The tension could have been defused but for their fathers who made needless statements in public. Yet the two tagged along despite the now-growing differences.
But the differences apparently became acute following Bhupathi’s association with Globosport, a sports management firm. In some quarters, it was deemed as a needless distraction, feeding on Bhupathi’s mental energy.
There are other reports too that Paes formed a partnership with another player when Bhupati was down with an injury and was out of action for few months. Bhupati apparently did not take a liking to it.
Bhupathi wrote a letter to state ministry stating the intervention in the matter that, AITA know all along the two teams could be sent to London and there would be no confusion if the federation had selected the two teams.
#3 – Martina Navratilova and Pam Shriver:
In what may be the most famous breakup of a successful partnership in tennis history, Martina Navratilova and Pam Shriver announced that they were no longer a doubles team in 1989.
Navratilova and Shriver had won a record 20 Grand Slam titles. They officially parted ways at the 1989 U.S. Open where Navratilova played with a new partner, Hana Mandlikova.
“It came as somewhat of a surprise to me” said Shriver.
“Maybe it shouldn’t have. I don’t have enough time to talk about everything that’s gone on. This has nothing to do with (Shriver’s) tennis. I just needed a break.” – Navratilova
Shriver: “I can’t tell if I’m on trial . . . It’s hard to tell if it’s permanent or not. I can understand, certainly I asked for some of it myself. I wasn’t focused. I was all over the place. Eight-and-a-half years together is probably a record anyway. If this is it, it’s been a hell of a race.”
The tension was palpable and it was clear that they had split up for good.
Together, Navratilova and Shriver won four U.S. Open, five Wimbledon, four French Open and seven Australian Open titles. Their first Grand Slam title was at Wimbledon in 1981, and their last was at the 1989 Australian Open.
They didn’t lose a match for more than two years, a stretch of 109 consecutive victories that ended when Kathy Jordan and Liz Smylie beat them in the 1985 Wimbledon final.
#4 – Sara Errani and Roberta Vinci:
Sara Errani and Roberta Vinci playing doubles together was considered one of those universal facts. Like the earth going around the sun. Yet there it was, an official announcement from the number-one ranked women’s team in the world:
“After living a wonderful journey for the past several years, which has given us the chance to reach amazing results, we release the following note to inform you about our decision to end our doubles partnership,” the Italians wrote in a joint statement. They added: “It’s our common purpose to start new individual career paths and set brand new goals to try to reach, also for you to enjoy and take pride in.”
Their legacy will be in doubles. They have won five major championships together and dominated the Fed Cup, leading Italy to three titles. They’re one of only five women’s teams to ever win the career Grand Slam. If they’d stayed together, they had the potential to be recognised as one of the greatest duos in the sport’s history.
Errani and Vinci are both undersized players (5’4″ and 5’5″, respectively) with limited athleticism, but in doubles, their skills meshed perfectly. They faced down all comers during their reign: outlasting Venus and Serena Williams on the way to their first Australian Open title, crushing Andrea Hlavackova and Lucie Hradecka to win the U.S. Open, sprinting past Liezel Huber and Lisa Raymond in a classic French Open match.
— Sara Errani (@SaraErrani) February 18, 2015
For a pair known by all for their fondness of each other, this was yet another shocking and inexplicable split.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of our Company, partners and other organizations. While any information provided on our blog is true to the best of our knowledge, we do not guarantee the veracity, reliability or completeness of the information presented. Any advice or opinion is purely for information purposes and should not be construed as an alternative to professional advice.